Ontvang nu dagelijks onze kooptips!
word abonnee
sluiten ✕
Terug naar discussie overzicht
Alleen voor cryptonauten
Volgen
Als we het over blockchain en crypto hebben, praten we eigenlijk altijd over publieke blockchains. Ik ken maar 1 private blockchain, R3 / Korda, dat is een initiatief van een aantal banken die proberen op deze manier hun processen te verbeteren. Nu zijn er wel degelijk cryptomunten waar je vragen mag stellen bij het nut van de muntje. Om een voorbeeld te geven Aave, vroeger ETHLend, is een softwareprogramma, die draait op het ethereum netwerk, waar je volledig geautomatiseerd leningen kunt afsluiten, of je bv je ETH tegen beloning kunt uitlenen. Dat werkt verder prima, maar je mag je afvragen waarom je het Aave token zou willen kopen omdat het niet nodig is om het netwerk te beveiligen. Dat is er namelijk niet. Het is enkel een softwareprogramma. Vaak kun je dan met het token inspraak hebben in de governance van de software. Als je dat wilt, dan ja, kun je dat token kopen. Ook decentrale exchanges als Uniswap hebben een token, maar geen netwerk wat door het token beveiligd wordt. Waardoor ook hier de vraag gerechtvaardigd is, waarom zou je het token kopen?
HCohen schreef op 31 augustus 2022 16:22 :
[...]
Beter lezen en leren nuanceren , die eerdere uitspraak was dus niet genoeg genuanceerd.
Ik begrijp dat je snel gegoogled hebt of een blockchain zonder coin kan en toen ben je bij dat Cointelegraph-artikel uitgekomen. Daar heb je voor het eerst van een private blockchain gehoord die inderdaad zonder token kan. Denk je nu dat je een punt gemaakt hebt? Denk je dat je hebt aangetoond dat bv bitcoin of ethereum, of eender welk decentraal crypto netwerk zonder token kan? Dat heb je niet. Je hebt ontdekt dat er ook private blockchains kunnen zijn. Maar daar gaat het gesprek never nooit niet over en ook nu niet.
Knife Catcher schreef op 31 augustus 2022 15:50 :
Tamelijk arrogante reactie en niet eens correct. Laat ik het daar maar bij houden.
Ik begrijp dat je boos bent als je gecorrigeerd wordt, maar mijn reactie incorrect noemen vraagt toch echt om toelichting.
Zaphod Beeblebrox schreef op 31 augustus 2022 16:24 :
Als we het over blockchain en crypto hebben, praten we eigenlijk altijd over publieke blockchains.
Ik ken maar 1 private blockchain , R3 / Korda, dat is een initiatief van een aantal banken die proberen op deze manier hun processen te verbeteren.
Je vergeet Hyperledger.www.hyperledger.org/ Blockgraph,www.blockgraph.co/ Tracr,www.tracr.com/ Mediachain www.mediachain.io/ en anderen... En er zijn tevens Hybrid blockchains zoals Dragonchaindragonchain.com/ Of LTO Networkwww.ltonetwork.com/ Aergo Enterprise- Samsung hybrid blockchainwww.aergo.io/ Hybrid blockchains combine the two worlds of public and private blockchains. Hybrids typically combine the privacy features of private blockchains alongside the security/ transparency features of public blockchains. It avails businesses’ substantial flexibility to choose what data to make public and what data to make private. With a hybrid blockchain, a business can make the platform accessible to everyone in the world (through a public blockchain), while a private blockchain runs in the background with the purpose of controlling access to ledger modifications and editing
Goed gegoogled jongen. Maar wat heb je nu bewezen? Er zijn private blockchains en die hebben geen token nodig. Denk je nu dat bitcoin ook zonder token kan?
- Zo veel woede! -En ongefundeerde naar alle waarschijnlijkheid onmogelijk waar te maken pretenties(gezien oa je gebrek aan kennis) Welnu, ik doe Enzo een plezier en zet je op mijn 'ik negeer je lijstje'.
HCohen schreef op 31 augustus 2022 17:03 :
- Zo veel woede! -
En ongefundeerde naar alle waarschijnlijkheid onmogelijk waar te maken pretenties(gezien oa je gebrek aan kennis) Welnu, ik doe Enzo een plezier en zet je op mijn 'ik negeer je lijstje'.
Mooi zo, vooral wegblijven. Maar natuurlijk geen antwoord op mijn vraag (wel veel beledigingen weer): kan bv bitcoin zonder token, want daar ging de discussie over. Niet over het wat aparte fenomeen van de private blockchains. Want het antwoord op die vraag is: nee, dat kan niet. Het token is een essentieel en onlosmakelijk onderdeel van een gedecentraliseerd, permissieloos, consensus algoritme.
FBI Warns About Decentralized Finance Exploits and the Losses Associated With Them news.bitcoin.com/fbi-warns-about-dece...
Zaphod Beeblebrox schreef op 31 augustus 2022 16:24 :
Nu zijn er wel degelijk cryptomunten waar je vragen mag stellen bij het nut van de muntje.
HAHA , je bent goed op weg. Al doende leert men.
Zaphod Beeblebrox schreef op 31 augustus 2022 16:50 :
Denk je nu dat bitcoin ook zonder token kan?
Sterker nog we kunnen zonder bitcoin.
Het probleem met private blockchains is dat ze, in tegenstelling tot public blockchains, nog steeds beveiligd moeten worden, vergelijkbaar met een gewone database. Ik zie de meerwaarde dan ook niet zo. Ik heb werk gedaan voor een grote verzekeraar, die waren een paar jaar geleden ook met private blockchains bezig, maar dat is helemaal doodgebloed. Het hele Hyperledger project hoor je weinig meer van.
Private Blockchains Were A Good Start: But They Are Not The Future ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The first email was sent in the early 1970s. Yet it would be more than 20 years before email even started to gain widespread, daily use by the public. Why? Certainly one of the reasons was that not everyone had access to a personal computer (let alone a smartphone in their pocket). But perhaps the biggest reason the use of email remained low is because it was used primarily within private networks—not outside of them. Universities, governmental departments, large businesses were using email - but it wasn’t until a public network—the World Wide Web—came along in the 1990s that email became widespread. Today, we see the same pattern repeating itself with blockchain technology. In an effort to address scalability and security challenges, businesses, governments and others have turned to private blockchains. These early adopters were right to look to blockchain to provide better coordination and verification - and many have attempted to leverage private blockchains to pilot and prove out specific uses - but their private blockchain solutions are already outdated and rapidly approaching their limits, both in terms of use case applicability, but just as importantly, choice of infrastructure. But for anyone familiar with history, let alone how quickly our industry moves, it’s not surprising that we are starting to hit the limits of private blockchains. First, the infrastructure is just too expensive to scale, and second, it fails to address the long term scaling requirements of global business. As Paul Brody, the Blockchain Lead at EY puts it: “Blockchains will do for networks of enterprises and business ecosystems what enterprise resource planning (ERP) did for the single company.” If that’s true - if that’s the future - then we can’t very well get there by building the same old siloed private blockchains. For many companies and institutions, the current use case for blockchain technology is the tracking of goods and services, dictated by contracts, which requires most businesses to interact with many different entities - businesses not just within their industry. Say you were operating an airline. Rarely do you talk to other airlines. Rather, you are trading information, services and goods back and forth between the airline, the TSA, vendors, financial institutions, air traffic control, suppliers, passengers and employees. The list goes on. If each airline has its own private blockchain, the daily exchange becomes too burdensome, too slow and too costly. The only way to effectively address these issues is to build multi-party business applications on an open system, enabled by universal standards. By definition, private blockchains are also not truly open. They provide control (and leverage) to a select number of individuals. A truly open blockchain network - a public one - will always beat a semi-decentralized one. Why? The more decentralized, the better - because less control over users is better - and because the network of various counter-parties can grow faster as industry participants change. Finally, privacy and security. In an era when rarely a week goes by without news of a major data breach, the single best way to safeguard process integrity is on a public blockchain. Only a fully decentralized blockchain can protect against a single point of failure. Private blockchains are only as good as their weakest link. Of course, the necessary shift from private to public blockchains doesn’t mean we can’t have private, encrypted data on a public blockchain. Already, protocols have been developed to achieve this with public blockchains. One, EY’s Nightfall, keeps transactions that occur over public blockchains secure and private. Others have been working on similar protocols to achieve the same security. The more we continue to experience a constant stream of data breaches and government and corporate monitoring of communications, the more a requirement and desire for a permanent, scalable and sustainable solution will grow. To be able to deliver that solution, blockchain networks will have to follow the public path that email took more than three decades ago. Just like e-mail, time is once again showing that for wide-scale blockchain adoption to take hold and to realize the technology’s full potential, an open application system built on public blockchains must be the future. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------www.forbes.com/sites/mattspoke/2019/0...
cointelegraph.com/news/helium-devs-pr... Helium devs gaan hun eigen blockchain vervangen door Solana. Op dat nieuws is HNT (Helium) nogal voorspelbaar goed omlaag gekukeld vandaag. Ik speelde zelf ook met de gedachte om wat helium te kopen. Het is een blockchain specifiek voor het IoT. Gebruikers installeren een helium hotspot om zo een 5G netwerk te genereren waarvoor ze coins ontvangen. Zou wat kunnen zijn, echter, als ze dezelfde activiteiten naar Solana gaan verschuiven hoef ik het helium-token niet meer.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ll6ygk_iRgg Bijna 53 minuten Jurrien Timmer, Global Director of Macro for Fidelity Investments, in gesprek met Raoul Pal van Real vision.
bitcoinmagazine.nl/nieuws/on-chain-an... Omdat bitcoin een netwerk is en een weelde aan data wordt opgeslagen, zijn er onchain analisten die daaruit allerlei indicatoren weten te destilleren. Bv de entity-adjusted coin days destroyed die sinds 2011 haarfijn de bodems aangeeft. Momenteel zou de bodem op 16300 moeten liggen. Op zich komt dat overeen met mijn persoonlijke verwachting dat we eerst stevig omhoog kunnen, mogelijk 28k zelfs, waarna we terugzakken en misschien wel een nieuwe low printen, waarom niet op 16300. Of, tegen die tijd, 16500 usd.
– De virtuele valuta’s vallen buiten de reikwijdte van de Wet op het financieel toezicht (Wft). DNB houdt zodoende geen toezicht op deze virtuele valuta’s. – Ook houdt DNB geen toezicht op ondernemingen die hierin handelen. Lees meer - De centrale bank wijst erop dat consumenten zich bewust moeten zijn van het ontbreken van toezicht en zich dienen te realiseren welke risico's zij lopen wanneer zij valuta's als bitcoin aanschaffen. - De wisselkoers van bitcoins is volatiel en er is geen centrale uitgever die door consumenten waar nodig aansprakelijk kan worden gesteld. - Ook is het depositogarantiestelsel niet van toepassing, dat bijvoorbeeld reguliere spaarders beschermt tot 100 duizend euro als een bank omvalt.
New Study Says Number of Cryptocurrencies Now at 10,000 — Five Coins Account for 75% of Total Market Cap news.bitcoin.com/new-study-says-numbe... The number of known cryptocurrencies surged from 6,000 in July 2021 to 10,400 in February 2022 before dropping to around 10,000 by August. Only five cryptocurrencies currently account for over 75% of the entire crypto industry market capitalization. A Thousand Cryptocurrencies Added Every Month According to the data from Augusta Free Press, the number of known cryptocurrencies went up from 6,000 in July 2021 to around 10,400 by February 2022. However, this number had dropped to around 10,000 by August 2022, the data revealed. Before surging past the 10,000 mark, the number of cryptocurrencies — according to a study by Statista and Investing.com — had grown from 60 in 2013 to over 4,500 by 2020. As shown by the data, in the period between 2021 and 2022, the number of cryptocurrencies has doubled. Remarking on this phenomenal growth in the number of cryptocurrencies added, the Augusta Free Press report said: In the first half of 2021 only, 1,500 new digital coins entered the market, with their number rising to over 6,000 in July. At the end of last year[2021], the market was adding about 1,000 new cryptocurrencies each month, with their total number reaching 9,900 in January 2022. Five Cryptos Account for Over 75 of Market Cap Despite this surge in the number of cryptocurrencies, just five cryptocurrencies account for over 75% of the crypto industry’s total market capitalization. At the time of writing, bitcoin, which came close to reaching $70,000 in November 2021, was trading at just below $20,000 and had a market capitalization of over $377 billion. With this market capitalization bitcoin accounts for 40% of the entire crypto market cap. Ethereum, the next top-ranked cryptocurrency by market capitalization, accounts for 20% of the total market cap. Completing the top five ranked cryptocurrencies are the stablecoins tether and USDC as well as BNB. This means that the rest of approximately 10,000 cryptocurrencies only account for just 24% of the total market capitalization. Even though the Augusta Free Press report appears to suggest that the number of cryptocurrencies only went past the 10,000 mark in 2022, the crypto market cap aggregator coinmarketcap.com has 20,797 listed coins, while the platform coingecko.com has 12,892.
In het begin was er alleen bitcoin. Deze was goed voor 100% van alle crypto. Later zijn er altcoins gekomen, in eerste instantie allemaal kopiën van bitcoin. Toen was bitcoin goed voor meer dan 90, zelfs 95% marktaandeel. In 2015 is ethereum gekomen. Dat was een tijdlang de enige platform coin en had dus 100% van het marktaandeel van de platformnetwerken. Tegenwoordig zijn er talloze concurrenten en ofschoon ethereum met afstand de grootste is, is het marktaandeel wel gezakt. Er is dus een trend gaande van verspreiding van marktaandeel met de introductie van meerdere, serieuze netwerken. Dat is een hele gezonde ontwikkeling ofschoon je tegelijkertijd moet verwachten dat meer dan 90% van de cryptonetwerken het niet gaan redden, zoals dat altijd gaat bij startups.
InteressantWhat Was the First Cryptocurrency? There were cryptocurrencies before Bitcoin July 23, 2022 Reviewed by ERIKA RASURE Fact checked by SUZANNE KVILHAUG Cryptocurrencies existed before Bitcoin, but they didn't reach public attention until a few years after it was introduced in 2009. The first cryptocurrency was eCash, developed by the company DigiCash in 1990. The concept and company were created by cryptographer David Chaum, who in 1983 published a paper titled "Blind Signatures for Untraceable Payments." 1 Several other attempts ultimately led up to Bitcoin's creation, but it took more than 20 years to evolve into the popular cryptocurrency it is today. KEY TAKEAWAYS The first cryptocurrency was eCash, created by David Chaum's company DigiCash in 1990. There were several attempts to create a viable and accepted cryptocurrency before Bitcoin. eCash, B-money, Bit Gold, and Hashcash were very influential in Bitcoin's creation. What Is Cryptocurrency? eCash—The First Cryptocurrency In 1983, American cryptographer David Chaum proposed a form of electronic cash. He conceptualized a token currency that could be transferred between individuals safely and privately; the similarities to modern-day cryptocurrencies are striking. Chaum developed a so-called "blinding formula" to be used to encrypt information passed between individuals. "Blinded Cash" could thus be safely transferred between individuals, bearing a signature of authenticity and the ability to be modified without traceability. Chaum founded DigiCash to put his concept into practice several years later by creating the first cryptographic electronic money called eCash. Although DigiCash went bankrupt in 1998, the ideas the company put forward and some of its formulas and encryption tools played an important role in developing later digital currencies. It's common to find internet references to an attempt in the Netherlands to create crypto in the 1990s; however, this was apparently a smart card preloaded with digital money rather than a cryptographically designed currency. Other Early CryptocurrenciesE-Gold In 1996, Dr. Douglas Jackson and Barry Downey created electronic money that was tied to the possession of gold. This digital currency allowed users to transfer ownership of gold between users of a website, which quickly—albeit unintentionally—became a tool for money launderers and others seeking anonymity in their illegal activities. 2Bit Gold Nick Szabo, one of the early cryptocurrency pioneers, is credited with creating the concepts that eventually led to the creation of Bitcoin. This concept was called Bit Gold and used many of the same blockchain techniques, such as a peer-to-peer network, mining, a ledger or registry, and cryptography. Perhaps the most revolutionary aspect of the Bit Gold concept had to do with its movement away from centralized status. Bit Gold aimed to avoid reliance on centralized currency distributors and authorities. Szabo's aim was for Bit Gold to reflect the properties of real gold, thereby enabling users to eliminate the middleman. Bit Gold, like other attempts, was ultimately unsuccessful. However, it too inspired digital currencies that would enter the market a decade or more after its introduction.B-Money In 1998, developer Wei Dai proposed an "anonymous, distributed electronic cash system" called B-money. Dai suggested two different protocols, including one which required a broadcast channel that was both synchronous and unjammable. Ultimately, B-money was never successful; indeed, it differed from Bitcoin in many ways. Nonetheless, it was also an attempt at an anonymous, private, and secure electronic cash system.Nakamoto referenced elements of B-money in the Bitcoin whitepaper roughly a decade later, so the impact B-money had on the digital currency craze is undeniable. 3 In the B-money system, digital pseudonyms would be used to transfer currency through a decentralized network. The system even included a means for contract enforcement in-network without using a third party. Although Wei Dai proposed a whitepaper for B-money, it was ultimately unable to garner enough attention for a successful launch. Hashcash Developed in the mid-1990s, Hashcash was one of the most successful pre-bitcoin digital currencies. Hashcash was designed for various purposes, including minimizing email spam and preventing DDoS attacks. Hashcash opened up a wide array of possibilities that would only be realized nearly two decades later. Hashcash used a proof-of-work algorithm to aid the generation and distribution of new coins, much like many contemporary cryptocurrencies. Indeed, Hashcash also ran into many of the same problems as today's cryptocurrencies; in 1997, facing an increased processing power need, Hashcash eventually became less and less effective. Even though it eventually fizzled out, Hashcash saw a significant degree of interest in its heyday. As a result, many of the elements of the Hashcash system worked their way into Bitcoin's development.
Hashcash was een uitvinding van Adam Back, momenteel de CEO van blockstream, met name bedoeld om email spam tegen te gaan, maar het principe wordt gebruikt in het bitcoin mining process. Een andere belangrijke naam is Hal Finney, de uitvinder van de reusable PoW blockchain. Velen menen dat zowel Adam Back als Hal Finney goede kandidaten zijn achter het pseudoniem Satoshi Nakamoto. De allereerste bitcoin transactie ging van Satoshi Nakamoto naar Hal Finney. Zijn zij dezelfde persoon? Daarentegen zijn de schrijfsels van Satoshi Nakamoto in Brits Engels wat een voorkeur uitspreekt voor Adam Back. Hoe dan ook, bitcoin is niet uit de lucht gevallen maar het resultaat van decennialang proberen een cryptografisch beveiligde e-currency te ontwerpen.
Aantal posts per pagina:
20
50
100
Direct naar Forum
-- Selecteer een forum --
Koffiekamer
Belastingzaken
Beleggingsfondsen
Beursspel
BioPharma
Daytraders
Garantieproducten
Opties
Technische Analyse
Technische Analyse Software
Vastgoed
Warrants
10 van Tak
4Energy Invest
Aalberts
AB InBev
Abionyx Pharma
Ablynx
ABN AMRO
ABO-Group
Acacia Pharma
Accell Group
Accentis
Accsys Technologies
ACCSYS TECHNOLOGIES PLC
Ackermans & van Haaren
ADMA Biologics
Adomos
AdUX
Adyen
Aedifica
Aegon
AFC Ajax
Affimed NV
ageas
Agfa-Gevaert
Ahold
Air France - KLM
Airspray
Akka Technologies
AkzoNobel
Alfen
Allfunds Group
Allfunds Group
Almunda Professionals (vh Novisource)
Alpha Pro Tech
Alphabet Inc.
Altice
Alumexx ((Voorheen Phelix (voorheen Inverko))
AM
Amarin Corporation
Amerikaanse aandelen
AMG
AMS
Amsterdam Commodities
AMT Holding
Anavex Life Sciences Corp
Antonov
Aperam
Apollo Alternative Assets
Apple
Arcadis
Arcelor Mittal
Archos
Arcona Property Fund
arGEN-X
Aroundtown SA
Arrowhead Research
Ascencio
ASIT biotech
ASMI
ASML
ASR Nederland
ATAI Life Sciences
Atenor Group
Athlon Group
Atrium European Real Estate
Auplata
Avantium
Axsome Therapeutics
Azelis Group
Azerion
B&S Group
Baan
Ballast Nedam
BALTA GROUP N.V.
BAM Groep
Banco de Sabadell
Banimmo A
Barco
Barrick Gold
BASF SE
Basic-Fit
Basilix
Batenburg Beheer
BE Semiconductor
Beaulieulaan
Befimmo
Bekaert
Belgische aandelen
Beluga
Beter Bed
Bever
Binck
Biocartis
Biophytis
Biosynex
Biotalys
Bitcoin en andere cryptocurrencies
bluebird bio
Blydenstijn-Willink
BMW
BNP Paribas S.A.
Boeing Company
Bols (Lucas Bols N.V.)
Bone Therapeutics
Borr Drilling
Boskalis
BP PLC
bpost
Brand Funding
Brederode
Brill
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Brunel
C/Tac
Campine
Canadese aandelen
Care Property Invest
Carmila
Carrefour
Cate, ten
CECONOMY
Celyad
CFD's
CFE
CGG
Chinese aandelen
Cibox Interactive
Citygroup
Claranova
CM.com
Co.Br.Ha.
Coca-Cola European Partners
Cofinimmo
Cognosec
Colruyt
Commerzbank
Compagnie des Alpes
Compagnie du Bois Sauvage
Connect Group
Continental AG
Corbion
Core Labs
Corporate Express
Corus
Crescent (voorheen Option)
Crown van Gelder
Crucell
CTP
Curetis
CV-meter
CVC Capital Partners
Cyber Security 1 AB
Cybergun
D'Ieteren
D.E Master Blenders 1753
Deceuninck
Delta Lloyd
DEME
Deutsche Cannabis
DEUTSCHE POST AG
Dexia
DGB Group
DIA
Diegem Kennedy
Distri-Land Certificate
DNC
Dockwise
DPA Flex Group
Draka Holding
DSC2
DSM
Duitse aandelen
Dutch Star Companies ONE
Duurzaam Beleggen
DVRG
Ease2pay
Ebusco
Eckert-Ziegler
Econocom Group
Econosto
Edelmetalen
Ekopak
Elastic N.V.
Elia
Endemol
Energie
Energiekontor
Engie
Envipco
Erasmus Beursspel
Eriks
Esperite (voorheen Cryo Save)
EUR/USD
Eurobio
Eurocastle
Eurocommercial Properties
Euronav
Euronext
Euronext
Euronext.liffe Optiecompetitie
Europcar Mobility Group
Europlasma
EVC
EVS Broadcast Equipment
Exact
Exmar
Exor
Facebook
Fagron
Fastned
Fingerprint Cards AB
First Solar Inc
FlatexDeGiro
Floridienne
Flow Traders
Fluxys Belgium D
FNG (voorheen DICO International)
Fondsmanager Gezocht
ForFarmers
Fountain
Frans Maas
Franse aandelen
FuelCell Energy
Fugro
Futures
FX, Forex, foreign exchange market, valutamarkt
Galapagos
Gamma
Gaussin
GBL
Gemalto
General Electric
Genfit
Genmab
GeoJunxion
Getronics
Gilead Sciences
Gimv
Global Graphics
Goud
GrandVision
Great Panther Mining
Greenyard
Grolsch
Grondstoffen
Grontmij
Guru
Hagemeyer
HAL
Hamon Groep
Hedge funds: Haaien of helden?
Heijmans
Heineken
Hello Fresh
HES Beheer
Hitt
Holland Colours
Homburg Invest
Home Invest Belgium
Hoop Effektenbank, v.d.
Hunter Douglas
Hydratec Industries (v/h Nyloplast)
HyGear (NPEX effectenbeurs)
HYLORIS
Hypotheken
IBA
ICT Automatisering
Iep Invest (voorheen Punch International)
Ierse aandelen
IEX Group
IEX.nl Sparen
IMCD
Immo Moury
Immobel
Imtech
ING Groep
Innoconcepts
InPost
Insmed Incorporated (INSM)
IntegraGen
Intel
Intertrust
Intervest Offices & Warehouses
Intrasense
InVivo Therapeutics Holdings Corp (NVIV)
Isotis
JDE PEET'S
Jensen-Group
Jetix Europe
Johnson & Johnson
Just Eat Takeaway
Kardan
Kas Bank
KBC Ancora
KBC Groep
Kendrion
Keyware Technologies
Kiadis Pharma
Kinepolis Group
KKO International
Klépierre
KPN
KPNQwest
KUKA AG
La Jolla Pharmaceutical
Lavide Holding (voorheen Qurius)
LBC
LBI International
Leasinvest
Logica
Lotus Bakeries
Macintosh Retail Group
Majorel
Marel
Mastrad
Materialise NV
McGregor
MDxHealth
Mediq
Melexis
Merus Labs International
Merus NV
Microsoft
Miko
Mithra Pharmaceuticals
Montea
Moolen, van der
Mopoli
Morefield Group
Mota-Engil Africa
MotorK
Moury Construct
MTY Holdings (voorheen Alanheri)
Nationale Bank van België
Nationale Nederlanden
NBZ
Nedap
Nedfield
Nedschroef
Nedsense Enterpr
Nel ASA
Neoen SA
Neopost
Neovacs
NEPI Rockcastle
Netflix
New Sources Energy
Neways Electronics
NewTree
NexTech AR Solutions
NIBC
Nieuwe Steen Investments
Nintendo
Nokia
Nokia OYJ
Nokia Oyj
Novacyt
NOVO-NORDISK AS
NPEX
NR21
Numico
Nutreco
Nvidia
NWE Nederlandse AM Hypotheek Bank
NX Filtration
NXP Semiconductors NV
Nyrstar
Nyxoah
Océ
OCI
Octoplus
Oil States International
Onconova Therapeutics
Ontex
Onward Medical
Onxeo SA
OpenTV
OpGen
Opinies - Tilburg Trading Club
Opportunty Investment Management
Orange Belgium
Oranjewoud
Ordina Beheer
Oud ForFarmers
Oxurion (vh ThromboGenics)
P&O Nedlloyd
PAVmed
Payton Planar Magnetics
Perpetuals, Steepeners
Pershing Square Holdings Ltd
Personalized Nursing Services
Pfizer
Pharco
Pharming
Pharnext
Philips
Picanol
Pieris Pharmaceuticals
Plug Power
Politiek
Porceleyne Fles
Portugese aandelen
PostNL
Priority Telecom
Prologis Euro Prop
ProQR Therapeutics
PROSIEBENSAT.1 MEDIA SE
Prosus
Proximus
Qrf
Qualcomm
Quest For Growth
Rabobank Certificaat
Randstad
Range Beleggen
Recticel
Reed Elsevier
Reesink
Refresco Gerber
Reibel
Relief therapeutics
Renewi
Rente en valuta
Resilux
Retail Estates
RoodMicrotec
Roularta Media
Royal Bank Of Scotland
Royal Dutch Shell
RTL Group
RTL Group
S&P 500
Samas Groep
Sapec
SBM Offshore
Scandinavische (Noorse, Zweedse, Deense, Finse) aandelen
Schuitema
Seagull
Sequana Medical
Shurgard
Siemens Gamesa
Sif Holding
Signify
Simac
Sioen Industries
Sipef
Sligro Food Group
SMA Solar technology
Smartphoto Group
Smit Internationale
Snowworld
SNS Fundcoach Beleggingsfondsen Competitie
SNS Reaal
SNS Small & Midcap Competitie
Sofina
Softimat
Solocal Group
Solvac
Solvay
Sopheon
Spadel
Sparen voor later
Spectra7 Microsystems
Spotify
Spyker N.V.
Stellantis
Stellantis
Stern
Stork
Sucraf A en B
Sunrun
Super de Boer
SVK (Scheerders van Kerchove)
Syensqo
Systeem Trading
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC)
Technicolor
Tele Atlas
Telegraaf Media
Telenet Groep Holding
Tencent Holdings Ltd
Tesla Motors Inc.
Tessenderlo Group
Tetragon Financial Group
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
Texaf
Theon International
TherapeuticsMD
Thunderbird Resorts
TIE
Tigenix
Tikkurila
TINC
TITAN CEMENT INTERNATIONAL
TKH Group
TMC
TNT Express
TomTom
Transocean
Trigano
Tubize
Turbo's
Twilio
UCB
Umicore
Unibail-Rodamco
Unifiedpost
Unilever
Unilever
uniQure
Unit 4 Agresso
Univar
Universal Music Group
USG People
Vallourec
Value8
Value8 Cum Pref
Van de Velde
Van Lanschot
Vastned
Vastned Retail Belgium
Vedior
VendexKBB
VEON
Vermogensbeheer
Versatel
VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS
VGP
Via Net.Works
Viohalco
Vivendi
Vivoryon Therapeutics
VNU
VolkerWessels
Volkswagen
Volta Finance
Vonovia
Vopak
Warehouses
Wave Life Sciences Ltd
Wavin
WDP
Wegener
Weibo Corp
Wereldhave
Wereldhave Belgium
Wessanen
What's Cooking
Wolters Kluwer
X-FAB
Xebec
Xeikon
Xior
Yatra Capital Limited
Zalando
Zenitel
Zénobe Gramme
Ziggo
Zilver - Silver World Spot (USD)
Premium
Word nu abonnee van IEX en krijg onbeperkt toegang tot onze (koop)tips en succesvolle modelportefeuilles. Nu 3 maanden voor slechts €19,95! Profiteer van 58% korting!
Word abonnee