Van beleggers
voor beleggers
desktop iconMarkt Monitor
  • Word abonnee
  • Inloggen

    Inloggen

    • Geen account? Registreren

    Wachtwoord vergeten?

Ontvang nu dagelijks onze kooptips!

word abonnee

Aandeel Galapagos AEX:GLPG.NL, BE0003818359

  • 26,800 29 apr 2024 13:26
  • +0,120 (+0,45%) Dagrange 26,760 - 26,860
  • 10.740 Gem. (3M) 82K

Galapagos 2018. De inhoudelijke discussie.

560 Posts
Pagina: «« 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 ... 28 »» | Laatste | Omlaag ↓
  1. HansGarrincha 9 april 2018 18:31
    seekingalpha.com/pr/17123523-upadacit...

    In terms of adjudicated venous thromboembolic events (VTE) through Week 26, one patient had a deep vein thrombosis (DVT; 0.15 percent) and another had a pulmonary embolism (PE; 0.15 percent) in the upadacitinib group, three patients had a PE in the adalimumab group (0.92 percent) and one had a PE in the placebo group (0.15 percent).1 Across the SELECT rheumatoid arthritis program, including both the placebo-controlled and extension periods, the rate of DVT and PE remains consistent with the background rate for the rheumatoid arthritis patient population.1-4,20-22

    AbbVie plans global regulatory submissions for upadacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis in the second half of 2018.

  2. NielsjeB 18 april 2018 21:24
    Effect of filgotinib, a selective JAK 1 inhibitor, with and without methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: patient-reported outcomes

    Received: 28 November 2017 Accepted: 8 February 2018
    Published online: 23 March 2018


    arthritis-research.biomedcentral.com/...
    twitter.com/DrJuanOvalles/status/9866...
  3. Beurskingpin 19 april 2018 09:34
    quote:

    NielsjeB schreef op 18 april 2018 21:24:

    Effect of filgotinib, a selective JAK 1 inhibitor, with and without methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: patient-reported outcomes

    Received: 28 November 2017 Accepted: 8 February 2018
    Published online: 23 March 2018


    arthritis-research.biomedcentral.com/...
    twitter.com/DrJuanOvalles/status/9866...
    Finch2?
  4. maxen 19 april 2018 10:15
    quote:

    Beurskingpin schreef op 19 april 2018 09:34:

    [...]

    Finch2?
    Nope. Darwin1 en Darwin2. Wetenschappelijke artikelen lopen altijd achter op eerste publicatie resultaten van een trial per pb, nooit voor.
    Eerste artikel met resultaten over Finch2 zal derhalve nog een tijdje op zich laten wachten.
  5. forum rang 4 Lingus 19 april 2018 19:23
    Ik zag 'm ook op SeekingAlpha:
    Eli Lilly and Incyte down premarket ahead on bearish outlook on Ad Com review for arthritis med baricitinib
    Eli Lilly (NYSE:LLY) and collaboration partner Incyte (NASDAQ:INCY) are down 2% and 6%, respectively, premarket in response to the release of briefing documents for next Tuesday's FDA advisory committee review of Lilly's marketing application seeking approval for baricitinib for adults with active rheumatoid arthritis who have not responded adequately to methotrexate.
    Investors are spooked that the outcome may be another CRL (original received in April 2017). The conclusion section of the FDA's document (p. 186) begins: "Overall, the additional data provided in the resubmission did not substantially alter the efficacy and safety data in the original submission. Thus, questions remain regarding the benefit/risk assessment of baricitinib for RA patients."
    seekingalpha.com/news/3346815-eli-lil...
  6. maxen 19 april 2018 20:39
    quote:

    Lingus schreef op 19 april 2018 19:23:

    ...
    The conclusion section of the FDA's document (p. 186) begins: "Overall, the additional data provided in the resubmission did not substantially alter the efficacy and safety data in the original submission. Thus, questions remain regarding the benefit/risk assessment of baricitinib for RA patients."
    seekingalpha.com/news/3346815-eli-lil...
    Even de conclusie helemaal:

    Resubmission Conclusions
    Overall, the additional data provided in the resubmission did not substantially alter the efficacy
    and safety data in the original submission. Thus, questions remain regarding the benefit/risk
    assessment of baricitinib for RA patients.
    Both the 2 and 4 mg doses of baricitinib demonstrated efficacy compared to placebo in RA
    patients. Given the safety issues identified with baricitinib, whether there is additional benefit of
    the 4 mg dose over the 2 mg dose is an issue we would like you to discuss at the AC meeting.
    Baricitinib has several safety signals consistent with a potent immunosuppressive. Thrombosis
    is a notable safety issue and we ask for you to discuss this safety issue and how that impacts the
    benefit/risk profile of baricitinib. Since most of the safety data are with the 4 mg dose of
    baricitinib and there are limited placebo control data, interpretation of the safety data is
    challenging, particularly when events continue to accrue in patients treated with open-label
    baricitinib. This raises the question of whether the 2 mg dose has a favorable benefit/risk profile;
    however, an important issue is whether there is sufficient safety data to inform the benefit/risk
    assessment of the baricitinib 2 mg dose. We ask for your input on all of these issues and look
    forward to the discussion.


    De toegevoegde data van de resubmission voegen nauwelijks wat toe aan de effectiviteits- en veiligheidsdata van de eerste submission.
    Voor 2mg eigenlijk te weinig safety data.
    Het blijft daarom onduidelijk of 2mg beter (want:minder bijwerkingen) is dan 4mg (wellicht wat effectiever).
    Te weinig placebo data. "Events" (lees: trombose-achtige problemen) blijven maar voorkomen bij patienten die via open-label baricitinib voorgeschreven krijgen.

    Kortom: ziet er niet heel goed uit.
  7. [verwijderd] 19 april 2018 20:43
    quote:

    maxen schreef op 19 april 2018 20:39:

    [...]
    Even de conclusie helemaal:

    Resubmission Conclusions
    Overall, the additional data provided in the resubmission did not substantially alter the efficacy
    and safety data in the original submission. Thus, questions remain regarding the benefit/risk
    assessment of baricitinib for RA patients.
    Both the 2 and 4 mg doses of baricitinib demonstrated efficacy compared to placebo in RA
    patients. Given the safety issues identified with baricitinib, whether there is additional benefit of
    the 4 mg dose over the 2 mg dose is an issue we would like you to discuss at the AC meeting.
    Baricitinib has several safety signals consistent with a potent immunosuppressive. Thrombosis
    is a notable safety issue and we ask for you to discuss this safety issue and how that impacts the
    benefit/risk profile of baricitinib. Since most of the safety data are with the 4 mg dose of
    baricitinib and there are limited placebo control data, interpretation of the safety data is
    challenging, particularly when events continue to accrue in patients treated with open-label
    baricitinib. This raises the question of whether the 2 mg dose has a favorable benefit/risk profile;
    however, an important issue is whether there is sufficient safety data to inform the benefit/risk
    assessment of the baricitinib 2 mg dose. We ask for your input on all of these issues and look
    forward to the discussion.


    De toegevoegde data van de resubmission voegen nauwelijks wat toe aan de effectiviteits- en veiligheidsdata van de eerste submission.
    Voor 2mg eigenlijk te weinig safety data.
    Het blijft daarom onduidelijk of 2mg beter (want:minder bijwerkingen) is dan 4mg (wellicht wat effectiever).
    Te weinig placebo data. "Events" (lees: trombose-achtige problemen) blijven maar voorkomen bij patienten die via open-label baricitinib voorgeschreven krijgen.

    Kortom: ziet er niet heel goed uit.
    Ziet er heel goed uit.
    Een concurrent van filgotinib minder !!!

    Filgotinib grijpt de macht.
  8. avantiavanti 23 april 2018 14:43
    quote:

    Opop schreef op 19 april 2018 20:16:

    FDA staff raises safety concerns over Lilly/Incyte arthritis drug

    This could be a positive for competitors such as AbbVie and Gilead and Galapagos that have their own oral JAK inhibitors in late-stage development," wrote Credit Suisse analysts.

    kfgo.com/news/articles/2018/apr/19/fd...
    Voor wie tijd/interesse heeft om de cast te volgen vanmiddag:

    April 23, 2018, Meeting of the Arthritis Advisory Committee (AAC) –

    Webcast Information
    The meeting webcast can be accessed at the following web address:

    collaboration.fda.gov/aac042318/
    Note: At the access page, please sign in as a guest. No password is required.
  9. [verwijderd] 23 april 2018 17:16
    quote:

    avantiavanti schreef op 23 april 2018 14:43:

    [...]

    Voor wie tijd/interesse heeft om de cast te volgen vanmiddag:

    April 23, 2018, Meeting of the Arthritis Advisory Committee (AAC) –

    Webcast Information
    The meeting webcast can be accessed at the following web address:

    collaboration.fda.gov/aac042318/
    Note: At the access page, please sign in as a guest. No password is required.
    Hoe laat?

    edit: Ik zie dat het nu al bezig is, baracitinib nu wordt besproken.
  10. avantiavanti 23 april 2018 17:22
    quote:

    MrBerth schreef op 23 april 2018 17:16:

    [...]

    Hoe laat? (ik zie dat het nu al bezig is, is er een agenda?)
    Hij is bezig sedert een uur. Ik kan cast niet volgen want op reis, maar kijk wel met 1 oog op twitter updates baricitinib. Bijvoorbeeld:

    #FDA’s Robert Abugov tells #AAC that both doses of $LLY’s baricitinib are clinically effective, but the difference between the doses is “likely pretty small.” He says the evidence doesn’t support the company’s proposed dosing strategy.
  11. Maycon 23 april 2018 17:32
    quote:

    avantiavanti schreef op 23 april 2018 17:22:

    [...]

    Hij is bezig sedert een uur. Ik kan cast niet volgen want op reis, maar kijk wel met 1 oog op twitter updates baricitinib. Bijvoorbeeld:

    #FDA’s Robert Abugov tells #AAC that both doses of $LLY’s baricitinib are clinically effective, but the difference between the doses is “likely pretty small.” He says the evidence doesn’t support the company’s proposed dosing strategy.
    Kreeg ook de indruk dat er nogal wat "concerns"waren m.b.t. wijze van rapporteren
560 Posts
Pagina: «« 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 ... 28 »» | Laatste |Omhoog ↑

Meedoen aan de discussie?

Word nu gratis lid of log in met je emailadres en wachtwoord.

Direct naar Forum

Premium

Weinig houvast voor beleggers in Galapagos

Het laatste advies leest u als abonnee van IEX Premium

Inloggen Word Abonnee

Lees verder op het IEX netwerk Let op: Artikelen linken naar andere sites

Gesponsorde links