Ontvang nu dagelijks onze kooptips!
word abonnee
sluiten ✕
Verkopen op deze bodemprijs? Zijn ze gek geworden daar? Softbank is met een kwart van de aandelen de grootste institutionele aandeelhouder. Als dat bericht waar is zou dat een slecht signaal zijn en geen teken van vertrouwen.
Dividend Collector schreef op 7 februari 2022 13:41 :
Verkopen op deze bodemprijs? Zijn ze gek geworden daar? Softbank is met een kwart van de aandelen de grootste institutionele aandeelhouder. Als dat bericht waar is zou dat een slecht signaal zijn en geen teken van vertrouwen.
Alibaba: The 1 Billion Share Registration Isn't Dilution Feb. 05, 2022 12:37 AM ET Summary An F-6EF form has been filed on Alibaba. The form is for an additional 1 billion ADRs, which is a very relevant number. I saw some concern this could represent dilution, hence this article clearing things up. seekingalpha.com/article/4484611-alib... Ik denk eerder dat ze deze ADR's nu willen laten registreren om ooit (op stuk hoger niveau) te kunnen verkopen zonder dat op dat moment (zoals nu) de markt opeens wakker geschud wordt en hierover nerveus zou worden. Nu kan de koers toch niet zo veel zakken, zullen ze denken, en misschien is het zeker al helemaal vergeten en zitten we een stuk hoger als ze met resultaten van Q3 komen.
Gaat nu wel eens tijd worden voor wat positief nieuws! Het ziet er naar uit dat we voor de 4e keer in 3 maanden de 111$ gaan testen. Ik koop nog 1 plukje bij om mijn GAK wat te verlagen en dan is het qua BABA goed zo. De resultaten moeten toch wel positief zijn? Toch voelt dit soms als een coin flip. Dan lees je ook nog dat verhaal over Softbank.. Als die gaan verkopen rond deze koersen dan staan we met een beetje pech zo rond de 90. Maar waarom zou Softbank dat doen? Alfie
Blijf nu op mijn handen zitten. Eerst eens wachten op de cijfers. Door al die maatregelen in China ben ik toch benieuwd wat dit voor gevolgen heeft gehad voor het 4e kwartaal 2021. Als ie hierdoor verder wegzakt, dan 'buy the deep dip', zonet en BABA stijgt, dan is het oké. Succes
www.alibabagroup.com/en/news/article?... “Cloud ME” Technology Defies Distance to Bring People Closer Together for Beijing 2022 Leuk voor tijdens het wachten op de results ;-).
denk dat Softbank deze aandelen zo kan doorschuiven naar Charlie Munger
Snap de stijging niet goed vandaag.... OK we komen gewoon terug op niveau van eind vorige week, dus dat zegt nog niets, maar snap echt niet waarom het nu zo stijgt.... toch voorbode van goede cijfers?
HongKong vannacht ook +6%. Ik krijg geen vat of dit nu de reactie op Frankfurt/NYSE is gisteren of dat we vandaag weer een dikke plus krijgen.
nine_inch_nerd schreef op 9 februari 2022 08:19 :
HongKong vannacht ook +6%. Ik krijg geen vat of dit nu de reactie op Frankfurt/NYSE is gisteren of dat we vandaag weer een dikke plus krijgen.
Reactie op newYork ( helaas…)
JP Samosa schreef op 9 februari 2022 09:30 :
[...]
Reactie op newYork ( helaas…)
Ja, lijkt erop. Momenteel Frankfurt en voorbeurs NYSE een kleine plus. Succes.
Softbank ziet verkoop belang Alibaba los van Amerikaanse aandelenregistratie - media Door ABM Financial News op 9 februari 2022 13:19 Softbank ziet verkoop belang Alibaba los van Amerikaanse aandelenregistratie - media (ABM FN-Dow Jones) De Japanse investeerder Softbank heeft de vrees onder beleggers dat de Japanse investeerder een grootschalige verkoop van aandelen Alibaba plant, weggenomen. Dit schreef persbureau Reuters woensdag op basis van een verklaring van de zijde van Softbank aan het persbureau. Alibaba diende vorige week een registratieverzoek in voor 1 miljard zogeheten American Depositary Shares. Analisten van Citigroup zeiden dat dit mogelijk de aanzet is tot een aandelenverkoop door Softbank. Softbank liet Reuters echter weten dat er geen verband is tussen de verkoop van een belang in Alibaba door Softbank en het registratieverzoek van het Chinese internetbedrijf in de Verenigde Staten. Softbanks CEO Masayoshi Son zei volgens Reuters tegenover analisten verrast te zijn over het verzoek van Alibaba in New York en benadrukte daar ook in het geheel geen bemoeienis mee te hebben. Softbank houdt een belang van 25 procent in Alibaba, goed voor 82 miljard dollar, terwijl de marktkapitalisatie van de investeerder niet verder reikt dan 84 miljard dollar. Bron: ABM Financial News
Geen enkel bericht wanneer de cijfers van Alibaba komen.www.alibabagroup.com/en/ir/newsevents
Wachten. Vandaag waarschijnlijk een licht rode dag.
seekingalpha.com/article/4485759-can-... Can Alibaba Actually Rebound? Oleh KombaievIntro Everything has its limit to resist pressure. This is equally true of a wooden board, the human psyche, or the market capitalization of a company. I want to say that everything has a certain line, beyond which a return to its previous state is no longer possible... This article is a critical assessment of the fundamental possibility that Alibaba's (NYSE:BABA) (OTCPK:BABAF) price will ever return to 2020 levels. Risks, Risks and more Risks In my opinion, there is hardly an investor who will say that Alibaba is now fundamentally overvalued. I mean, if you make a rough estimate of how much free cash flow the company can generate in the future and discount this amount, taking into account a reasonable cost of capital, then the resulting figure will exceed the current capitalization of Alibaba several times. So, everything is obvious, the issue is not a fundamental undervaluation, the issue is risks. I have already attempted to classify these risks: China's regulatory crackdown. The growing confrontation between the United States and China. Risk of complete delisting of the company in the US. This list can probably be shortened, given that the risk of delisting is a consequence of the tense relationship between the US and China. But in any case, when we talk about the pressure that Alibaba is under, we are talking about risks. Second Political Party of China Four years ago, China officially abandoned the rotation of power every 10 years. This was the beginning of the real transformation of the Chinese authoritarian regime into an autocratic one. Thus, Thomas Friedman's prediction that a slowdown in China's economic growth would lead to an increase in democracy has clearly not come true. Any power requires legitimacy. For years, this legitimacy for the Chinese government was provided by high economic growth rates that raised the standard of living of the population. But as the economy slowed down, the question of legitimacy became more pressing. For a long time, the Chinese technology sector developed unhindered. The government even supported and subsidized it. As a result, very large tech companies have emerged in China. These companies have accumulated huge capital, have at their disposal a colossal array of data and their management has become close to the Western world. To some extent, these companies got the opportunity to influence the processes in the country. In other words, they have become a second political party. But this is completely unacceptable to the Chinese government. It should not be forgotten that the ongoing downturn in the Chinese tech market began with the famous speech by Jack Ma on October 24, 2020 at the Bund Summit in Shanghai. Criticism of the ruling party headed by Xi Jinping was read between the lines of the speech. What started after that in terms of increased regulation of Chinese technology companies we all know well. The situation is further complicated by the fact that Xi Jinping is an aging leader. Judging by what we see in Belarus and Russia, such leaders are characterized by an increase in paranoid fears. This means that the Chinese president will be more inclined to overestimate the threat to his power from technology companies and their leaders in the future. In my opinion, in this context, the internal situation in China will never be the same, and even more likely to worsen. This is a bad deal for Alibaba and for any major Chinese company. US vs. China: Dynamics Towards Complexity Watching Biden as president of the United States, one should draw an interesting conclusion: Trump's policy towards China continues. The new administration has not abolished the tariffs on imported goods that were introduced under the previous president. More than that, judging by the statements of officials, these tariffs will not be abolished in the near future. On the other hand, the US Secretary of State accuses China of being more aggressive abroad and more repressive at home. Blinken also adds that the US should build relations with China "from a position of strength". For its part, China continues to strengthen relations with Russia. In the current crisis around Ukraine, China is almost openly taking the side of Russia in opposing NATO expansion. By the way, parallels can be drawn here: Ukraine is for Russia, as Taiwan is for China. China has repeatedly stated that it may use military force if Taiwan formally declares its independence. In turn, the US is an ally of Taiwan. And in the event of an aggravation of the situation, the United States will definitely begin by imposing new sanctions against China (just like now the United States are promising to impose sanctions against Russia if it invades Ukraine). These sanctions could easily affect the financial sector as well. It may not come to a forced delisting, but additional restrictions and disclosure rules for Chinese companies will be introduced for sure. Admittedly, the dynamics of relations between China and the United States tend to become more complex. Potentially, this means higher risks for Chinese companies listed on US stock market. Bottom line Risks (or fears) have an interesting property: they quickly appear and slowly disappear. This is the result of evolution. Those who quickly forgot that they should not enter the dark cave, as a rule, did not leave offspring. Despite the above thoughts, now I am not ready to confidently conclude that Alibaba's capitalization will no longer be able to return to its highs. There are also positive aspects of the situation that are worth writing about separately. But of one thing I am sure, the recovery will not be quick. The risks that caused the company's price to fall have no fundamental reasons for a decrease in the near future.
Ter info: Durk Veenstra van RTL Z zei net dat er vandaag toch cijfers zouden komen van BABA (vermoed ik, nadat hem werd gevraagd waar hij vandaag naar uitkeek). We zullen zien. Fijne dag.
nine_inch_nerd schreef op 11 februari 2022 08:13 :
Ter info:
Durk Veenstra van RTL Z zei net dat er vandaag toch cijfers zouden komen van BABA (vermoed ik, nadat hem werd gevraagd waar hij vandaag naar uitkeek). We zullen zien. Fijne dag.
24/02/2022..flashalert.me/?symbol=BABA&source...
Rider schreef op 11 februari 2022 10:34 :
[...]
24/02/2022..
flashalert.me/?symbol=BABA&source... Top, ben benieuwd. Wat een gedoe...
Rider schreef op 11 februari 2022 10:34 :
[...]
24/02/2022..
flashalert.me/?symbol=BABA&source... Thanks! Wordt spannend... Op zich wel blij dat ze pas over paar weken er zijn; hopelijk is de beurs dan wat minder nerveus.
Ter infoEconomists say the worst of China’s regulatory crackdown is over Evelyn Cheng Brendan McDermid | Reuters BEIJING — The worst of China’s regulatory crackdown is over as Beijing shifts its focus to supporting growth, economists said. That does not mean the end of regulation — which has swept across internet technology, real estate and other industries in the last year — but signals fewer major changes ahead, the analysts said. China’s economy slowed to 4% year-on-year growth in the fourth quarter, despite expanding by 8.1% for the full year. Sluggish consumer spending dragged down growth, while a slew of regulatory developments added to businesses’ uncertainty on top of the coronavirus pandemic. Chinese leaders’ new priority for 2022 is to defend 5% growth, Macquarie’s chief China economist Larry Hu said in a note late Wednesday. That means “peak anti-monopoly, peak property tightening and peak decarbonization are all behind us.” “Peak regulation means fewer and less intensive regulation changes this year, as the focus on regulation last year has given way to a focus on growth,” Hu added in an email. “Put differently, it means that the worst is over, but not a reversion to the past.” In 2021, Beijing cracked down on alleged monopolistic behavior by internet giants such as Alibaba, real estate property developers’ high reliance on debt and regional failures to reduce carbon emissions. Abrupt changes disrupted business, notably in factory power cuts and mass job losses at after-school tutoring centers. But in the last few months, official statements point to a softening in Beijing’s stance, analysts said. “As one senior official, Han Wenxiu, said in December, the government will refrain from launching policies that have negative impact on economic growth,” Zhiwei Zhang, chief economist at Pinpoint Asset Management, said in an email Thursday. “President Xi [Jinping] also published an article which reiterated the importance of digital economy. I’d expect the government to focus on economic stability this year.” Zhang doesn’t anticipate a reversal of regulations, just fewer major changes. His question is “how and when the government will implement the policies they already announced last year, such as the property tax pilot program and the registration based IPO reform.” Announcements this week added to signals on how Beijing would reduce its rigidity. Top leaders in December had already removed references to anti-monopoly, property policy and carbon neutrality from a list of economic tasks for 2022, Macquarie’s Hu said. Steelmakers get another five years to reduce emissions Then on Monday, China’s top economic planning agency and two ministries delayed the target year for the steel industry to reach peak carbon emissions by five years to 2030. The extra five years can reduce the burden on steelmakers by allowing them to spread out investments in decarbonization and avoid large capital expenditures in the short term, Moody’s analysts said in a note Wednesday. They don’t expect the change to affect the nation’s goal of reaching peak carbon emissions by 2030. “The government will continue to implement strict control over steel capacity and production while encouraging environmentally-friendly projects,” the analysts said. “Such efforts, along with the extension, will also help support stability in steel supply and prices.” Read more about China from CNBC Pro HSBC picks Chinese stocks to play a rising U.S. 10-year Treasury yield Credit Suisse says it’s time to pivot to China, and names 6 global stocks to buy Apple suppliers, metaverse and more: JPMorgan names its top Asian tech stocks to buy On Tuesday, the People’s Bank of China announced loans for affordable rental housing would not count toward the limited amount banks can lend to the property sector, freeing up more capital to support the real estate industry. More communication with markets That same day, the Chinese Communist Party’s official newspaper, People’s Daily, published an editorial stating that while rules on the use of capital are needed to reduce monopolistic behavior, among others, the economy still needs capital for growth. Beijing’s crackdown on alleged monopolistic behavior has particularly targeted internet technology companies like Alibaba that are listed in the U.S. This and other policy developments since Chinese ride-hailing company Didi listed in New York in late June have given international investors pause on putting money into the country. The People’s Daily article “suggests regulatory curbs on the internet sector will stay in place, but will likely become more rules based, with fading uncertainty as the regulatory framework takes shape,” Bruce Pang, head of strategy and macro research at China Renaissance, said in a note Tuesday. Regulation in line with political themes such as common prosperity — moderate wealth for all, rather than a few — and sustainable development will remain, Pang said. But “we think the authorities have begun to carefully manage the pace and intensity of the regulatory campaign in order to complete major economic and social development targets set for the next 5-10 years.” He noted how Chinese officials have started to communicate better with the market about the motives and reasons for regulation as well as areas of future government scrutiny. “Investor concerns may be driven less by the substance of proposed regulations and more by communication,” he said. The Shanghai composite is up more than 3% this week — the first trading week of the month due to a holiday — after falling by more than 7.5% in January. The Hang Seng Index is up more than 4% this month after gains of 1.7% in January. KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) — a U.S.-listed exchange traded fund that includes Chinese stocks listed abroad — plunged by more than 50% last year amid regulatory uncertainty. The ETF is up 5.4% so far in 2022. Not the end of regulation Peak regulation is certainly not the end of regulation, Macquarie’s Hu said in his report. He pointed to a similar regulatory peak at the end of 2018, which served as a turning point for a sell-off in mainland Chinese stocks, even though local governments and businesses continued to act. China’s government system often means local authorities vie for Beijing’s attention through sometimes extreme implementation measures. Official language from central government directives then often warns against “blindly” shutting down a line of business. For 2022, Beijing has emphasized stability above all. In the second half of the year, the ruling Chinese Communist Party is set to hold a meeting for determining top leadership positions — including the expected extension of President Xi Jinping’s term beyond that of his predecessors. The political pressure for stability comes after a year in which the Party celebrated its 100th anniversary. The country meanwhile had an economy bouncing back fast enough from the pandemic to withstand what analysts have called painful but necessary changes to address longstanding problems. Now, growth is slowing as China also tackles fresh coronavirus outbreaks. “The regulatory wave in 2020-21 brought many unintended consequences,” Hu said. “For instance, business confidence weakened, the property sector plunged, and commodity prices surged.” “The consequence of [Beijing’s] campaign-style is that things could easily be overdone. As the result, top leaders would have to fine-tune from time to time, decide the time to claim victory and move on to the next campaign,” Hu said. “It happened so many times over the past one hundred years, and will continue to happen in the future.”
Aantal posts per pagina:
20
50
100
Direct naar Forum
-- Selecteer een forum --
Koffiekamer
Belastingzaken
Beleggingsfondsen
Beursspel
BioPharma
Daytraders
Garantieproducten
Opties
Technische Analyse
Technische Analyse Software
Vastgoed
Warrants
10 van Tak
4Energy Invest
Aalberts
AB InBev
Abionyx Pharma
Ablynx
ABN AMRO
ABO-Group
Acacia Pharma
Accell Group
Accentis
Accsys Technologies
ACCSYS TECHNOLOGIES PLC
Ackermans & van Haaren
ADMA Biologics
Adomos
AdUX
Adyen
Aedifica
Aegon
AFC Ajax
Affimed NV
ageas
Agfa-Gevaert
Ahold
Air France - KLM
Airspray
Akka Technologies
AkzoNobel
Alfen
Allfunds Group
Allfunds Group
Almunda Professionals (vh Novisource)
Alpha Pro Tech
Alphabet Inc.
Altice
Alumexx ((Voorheen Phelix (voorheen Inverko))
AM
Amarin Corporation
Amerikaanse aandelen
AMG
AMS
Amsterdam Commodities
AMT Holding
Anavex Life Sciences Corp
Antonov
Aperam
Apollo Alternative Assets
Apple
Arcadis
Arcelor Mittal
Archos
Arcona Property Fund
arGEN-X
Aroundtown SA
Arrowhead Research
Ascencio
ASIT biotech
ASMI
ASML
ASR Nederland
ATAI Life Sciences
Atenor Group
Athlon Group
Atrium European Real Estate
Auplata
Avantium
Axsome Therapeutics
Azelis Group
Azerion
B&S Group
Baan
Ballast Nedam
BALTA GROUP N.V.
BAM Groep
Banco de Sabadell
Banimmo A
Barco
Barrick Gold
BASF SE
Basic-Fit
Basilix
Batenburg Beheer
BE Semiconductor
Beaulieulaan
Befimmo
Bekaert
Belgische aandelen
Beluga
Beter Bed
Bever
Binck
Biocartis
Biophytis
Biosynex
Biotalys
Bitcoin en andere cryptocurrencies
bluebird bio
Blydenstijn-Willink
BMW
BNP Paribas S.A.
Boeing Company
Bols (Lucas Bols N.V.)
Bone Therapeutics
Borr Drilling
Boskalis
BP PLC
bpost
Brand Funding
Brederode
Brill
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Brunel
C/Tac
Campine
Canadese aandelen
Care Property Invest
Carmila
Carrefour
Cate, ten
CECONOMY
Celyad
CFD's
CFE
CGG
Chinese aandelen
Cibox Interactive
Citygroup
Claranova
CM.com
Co.Br.Ha.
Coca-Cola European Partners
Cofinimmo
Cognosec
Colruyt
Commerzbank
Compagnie des Alpes
Compagnie du Bois Sauvage
Connect Group
Continental AG
Corbion
Core Labs
Corporate Express
Corus
Crescent (voorheen Option)
Crown van Gelder
Crucell
CTP
Curetis
CV-meter
CVC Capital Partners
Cyber Security 1 AB
Cybergun
D'Ieteren
D.E Master Blenders 1753
Deceuninck
Delta Lloyd
DEME
Deutsche Cannabis
DEUTSCHE POST AG
Dexia
DGB Group
DIA
Diegem Kennedy
Distri-Land Certificate
DNC
Dockwise
DPA Flex Group
Draka Holding
DSC2
DSM
Duitse aandelen
Dutch Star Companies ONE
Duurzaam Beleggen
DVRG
Ease2pay
Ebusco
Eckert-Ziegler
Econocom Group
Econosto
Edelmetalen
Ekopak
Elastic N.V.
Elia
Endemol
Energie
Energiekontor
Engie
Envipco
Erasmus Beursspel
Eriks
Esperite (voorheen Cryo Save)
EUR/USD
Eurobio
Eurocastle
Eurocommercial Properties
Euronav
Euronext
Euronext
Euronext.liffe Optiecompetitie
Europcar Mobility Group
Europlasma
EVC
EVS Broadcast Equipment
Exact
Exmar
Exor
Facebook
Fagron
Fastned
Fingerprint Cards AB
First Solar Inc
FlatexDeGiro
Floridienne
Flow Traders
Fluxys Belgium D
FNG (voorheen DICO International)
Fondsmanager Gezocht
ForFarmers
Fountain
Frans Maas
Franse aandelen
FuelCell Energy
Fugro
Futures
FX, Forex, foreign exchange market, valutamarkt
Galapagos
Gamma
Gaussin
GBL
Gemalto
General Electric
Genfit
Genmab
GeoJunxion
Getronics
Gilead Sciences
Gimv
Global Graphics
Goud
GrandVision
Great Panther Mining
Greenyard
Grolsch
Grondstoffen
Grontmij
Guru
Hagemeyer
HAL
Hamon Groep
Hedge funds: Haaien of helden?
Heijmans
Heineken
Hello Fresh
HES Beheer
Hitt
Holland Colours
Homburg Invest
Home Invest Belgium
Hoop Effektenbank, v.d.
Hunter Douglas
Hydratec Industries (v/h Nyloplast)
HyGear (NPEX effectenbeurs)
HYLORIS
Hypotheken
IBA
ICT Automatisering
Iep Invest (voorheen Punch International)
Ierse aandelen
IEX Group
IEX.nl Sparen
IMCD
Immo Moury
Immobel
Imtech
ING Groep
Innoconcepts
InPost
Insmed Incorporated (INSM)
IntegraGen
Intel
Intertrust
Intervest Offices & Warehouses
Intrasense
InVivo Therapeutics Holdings Corp (NVIV)
Isotis
JDE PEET'S
Jensen-Group
Jetix Europe
Johnson & Johnson
Just Eat Takeaway
Kardan
Kas Bank
KBC Ancora
KBC Groep
Kendrion
Keyware Technologies
Kiadis Pharma
Kinepolis Group
KKO International
Klépierre
KPN
KPNQwest
KUKA AG
La Jolla Pharmaceutical
Lavide Holding (voorheen Qurius)
LBC
LBI International
Leasinvest
Logica
Lotus Bakeries
Macintosh Retail Group
Majorel
Marel
Mastrad
Materialise NV
McGregor
MDxHealth
Mediq
Melexis
Merus Labs International
Merus NV
Microsoft
Miko
Mithra Pharmaceuticals
Montea
Moolen, van der
Mopoli
Morefield Group
Mota-Engil Africa
MotorK
Moury Construct
MTY Holdings (voorheen Alanheri)
Nationale Bank van België
Nationale Nederlanden
NBZ
Nedap
Nedfield
Nedschroef
Nedsense Enterpr
Nel ASA
Neoen SA
Neopost
Neovacs
NEPI Rockcastle
Netflix
New Sources Energy
Neways Electronics
NewTree
NexTech AR Solutions
NIBC
Nieuwe Steen Investments
Nintendo
Nokia
Nokia OYJ
Nokia Oyj
Novacyt
NOVO-NORDISK AS
NPEX
NR21
Numico
Nutreco
Nvidia
NWE Nederlandse AM Hypotheek Bank
NX Filtration
NXP Semiconductors NV
Nyrstar
Nyxoah
Océ
OCI
Octoplus
Oil States International
Onconova Therapeutics
Ontex
Onward Medical
Onxeo SA
OpenTV
OpGen
Opinies - Tilburg Trading Club
Opportunty Investment Management
Orange Belgium
Oranjewoud
Ordina Beheer
Oud ForFarmers
Oxurion (vh ThromboGenics)
P&O Nedlloyd
PAVmed
Payton Planar Magnetics
Perpetuals, Steepeners
Pershing Square Holdings Ltd
Personalized Nursing Services
Pfizer
Pharco
Pharming
Pharnext
Philips
Picanol
Pieris Pharmaceuticals
Plug Power
Politiek
Porceleyne Fles
Portugese aandelen
PostNL
Priority Telecom
Prologis Euro Prop
ProQR Therapeutics
PROSIEBENSAT.1 MEDIA SE
Prosus
Proximus
Qrf
Qualcomm
Quest For Growth
Rabobank Certificaat
Randstad
Range Beleggen
Recticel
Reed Elsevier
Reesink
Refresco Gerber
Reibel
Relief therapeutics
Renewi
Rente en valuta
Resilux
Retail Estates
RoodMicrotec
Roularta Media
Royal Bank Of Scotland
Royal Dutch Shell
RTL Group
RTL Group
S&P 500
Samas Groep
Sapec
SBM Offshore
Scandinavische (Noorse, Zweedse, Deense, Finse) aandelen
Schuitema
Seagull
Sequana Medical
Shurgard
Siemens Gamesa
Sif Holding
Signify
Simac
Sioen Industries
Sipef
Sligro Food Group
SMA Solar technology
Smartphoto Group
Smit Internationale
Snowworld
SNS Fundcoach Beleggingsfondsen Competitie
SNS Reaal
SNS Small & Midcap Competitie
Sofina
Softimat
Solocal Group
Solvac
Solvay
Sopheon
Spadel
Sparen voor later
Spectra7 Microsystems
Spotify
Spyker N.V.
Stellantis
Stellantis
Stern
Stork
Sucraf A en B
Sunrun
Super de Boer
SVK (Scheerders van Kerchove)
Syensqo
Systeem Trading
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC)
Technicolor
Tele Atlas
Telegraaf Media
Telenet Groep Holding
Tencent Holdings Ltd
Tesla Motors Inc.
Tessenderlo Group
Tetragon Financial Group
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
Texaf
Theon International
TherapeuticsMD
Thunderbird Resorts
TIE
Tigenix
Tikkurila
TINC
TITAN CEMENT INTERNATIONAL
TKH Group
TMC
TNT Express
TomTom
Transocean
Trigano
Tubize
Turbo's
Twilio
UCB
Umicore
Unibail-Rodamco
Unifiedpost
Unilever
Unilever
uniQure
Unit 4 Agresso
Univar
Universal Music Group
USG People
Vallourec
Value8
Value8 Cum Pref
Van de Velde
Van Lanschot
Vastned
Vastned Retail Belgium
Vedior
VendexKBB
VEON
Vermogensbeheer
Versatel
VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS
VGP
Via Net.Works
Viohalco
Vivendi
Vivoryon Therapeutics
VNU
VolkerWessels
Volkswagen
Volta Finance
Vonovia
Vopak
Warehouses
Wave Life Sciences Ltd
Wavin
WDP
Wegener
Weibo Corp
Wereldhave
Wereldhave Belgium
Wessanen
What's Cooking
Wolters Kluwer
X-FAB
Xebec
Xeikon
Xior
Yatra Capital Limited
Zalando
Zenitel
Zénobe Gramme
Ziggo
Zilver - Silver World Spot (USD)
Indices
AEX
878,71
-0,01%
EUR/USD
1,0725
+0,14%
FTSE 100
8.172,15
+0,63%
Germany40^
17.940,90
+0,25%
Gold spot
2.303,48
-0,01%
NY-Nasdaq Composite
15.840,96
+1,51%
Stijgers
Dalers